How did I not get this before. Icon Pop are the Swedish, 2010’s version of t.A.T.u.
Icon Pop are the Swedish, 2010’s version of t.A.T.u. Holy shit.
Maybe I’m alone in this, but this minor revelation totally stood my eyes and ears on end. Icona Pop aren’t that good? I don’t care. It doesn’t matter. Good has nothing to do with it. This should have been so obvious. Just because they’re Scandinavian doesn’t mean you should compare them to ABBA or Alphabeat. This is so great. I’m gonna have a relaxing, productive weekend now, sponsored by fucking Icona Pop. I love it.
I can’t begin to make sense of this at 8am, but if incomprehensible venn diagrams aren’t a perfect visual representation of the Mae Shi I don’t know what is.
When I was fifteen I was highly enamored of Blur’s “On Your Own”. I was taken with the guitar effect that kicks in at the end of each repetition of the riff, which I’ve since realized is just a particularly ingenious use of some relatively standard delay tricks. I was excited by the lyrics, which spoke about some things I understood, some things I didn’t and generally, and I still think I’m correct about this, were more or less nonsense. The electronic edge it had also added to my enjoyment - I had recently discovered that the drums on many songs were actually machines!
I never saw the video at the time. Understandable since the song did nothing in the US, maybe we never a single over here. Doubly understandable based on what the video actually contains. It would have confused me to no end then, and actually confuses me quite a good deal still.
Leaving aside the whole issue of the thing being dated as hell, it brings out a number of qualities of the song that I were not consciously recognized by me at the time, or even perhaps until I saw the video. One of these is the fact (?) that it’s sort of trying to be a hip hop song. While this is totally the wrong way to think about the song, it’s possible that that’s how the band and their marketing team saw it, and so they put Damon Albarn in a Kangol, called in some break dancers, and did some really misguided stuff with graffiti. This is sort of a travesty. Sure, the chorus isn’t exactly sung, and there’s an arpeggiated synth running through the thing, but damn, aren’t Blur smarter than to think that that means what they’re doing has anything to do with hip hop?
Maybe that’s why Graham Coxon looks so embarrassed through the whole thing. I don’t blame him.
And what’s Alex James even doing in the video? He must have demanded not be seen in the same frame with any of his bandmates, or near an actual instrument, or doing anything. “I’ll be in the video, but I won’t do anything more than wear this weird Magritte t-shirt.”
Which is all to say, wow. I’m very glad the 15 year old me was not exposed to this, because I doubt he still would have loved the song as much. And this, in fact, is a song that deserves to be loved. It may be silly, and if the video is any guide, it’s intentions may be somewhat misguided, but it captures a certain adolescent playfulness - let’s play with synths and delay, let’s make up some stupid lyrics - with a sense of gravity that Blur manages to pull off though, if nothing more, pure Anglophilic exoticism. Perhaps my doing their worst to appropriate American urban culture, they simply highlighted what made them so bloody English to begin with, and that’s the wavelength that still has me reaching for this song each spring, even 15 years later.
It may not be the greatest Future of the Left song.
But it’s a new music video for a new Future of the Left song, which, as Mr. Santorum would say, “makes me throw up”, but instead of how he means it (here is where I pretend to understand one iota of what Rick Santorum could ever be talking about), I mean it in a good way, like from joyful anticipation of a new full length record.
- It’s the best thing, musically, she’s done since “Caught Up” (dubious praise at best)
- They managed to make her not look like the stretchy robot plastic surgery sob story her face has become. She actually looks pretty great!
- The part where she walks on the wall is pretty cool.
- The song actually isn’t about football.
Bad things about the new Madonna video:
- The video has lots of football players in it, which makes sense right now, but once people forget about the fact that it was released right before she played the super bowl, it will look totally incomprehensible.
- The cheerleader section is awful.
- Nicki and MIA only get like 8 bars apiece, and don’t use them especially well.
- The end of the video features Madonna decapitating a football player and then throwing a baby. Where even 5 years ago the assumption would be that she’s trying to be provocative with decisions like this, here she just seems clueless. In light of the very impassioned ongoing discussion of head injuries in football, and the general tastelessness of injuring babies, people might want her to not do things that foreground such uncomfortable issues. Up until this point in the video, it seems like it might actually be a real step in the direction of relevance for Madonna, but this ending is one more, perhaps final, reminder that she’ll never again be the Madonna we fell in love with. We’ll see what she does on Sunday. Maybe, for the first time since nipplegate, a Super Bowl Halftime Show will actually mean something for someone’s career.